Hey folks,
I should have added this post here a while back, but it's been quite an eventful year.
My new site/blog is now my professional Web site:
EricThomasWeber.org.
Head over to check it out.
Also, if you haven't already, "like" my Facebook author page and follow me on Twitter @EricTWeber.
Wednesday, July 27, 2016
Thursday, May 21, 2015
"Purpose in Life and Work," Episode 2 of Philosophy Bakes Bread
For more information about my work, visit EricThomasWeber.org. You can follow me on Twitter @erictweber, and the Philosophy Bakes Bread podcast now has a twitter feed also: @PhilosophyBB.
"Purpose in Life and Work," Episode 2 of the Philosophy Bakes Bread podcast is now out. Click the title link here to visit the podcast Web site.
Brief description: This second episode of Philosophy Bakes Bread considers the challenge of envisioning and choosing the right purposes for oneself and for one’s organizations in life and at work.
For a little more info about the idea behind the podcast, see the introduction page. You can also subscribe to the podcast using this feed address: http://philosophybakesbread.com/feed/podcast/.
In a day or so, iTunes will have updated and will list the episode here: https://itunes.apple.com/tt/podcast/philosophy-bakes-bread/id976964260
"Purpose in Life and Work," Episode 2 of the Philosophy Bakes Bread podcast is now out. Click the title link here to visit the podcast Web site.
Brief description: This second episode of Philosophy Bakes Bread considers the challenge of envisioning and choosing the right purposes for oneself and for one’s organizations in life and at work.
For a little more info about the idea behind the podcast, see the introduction page. You can also subscribe to the podcast using this feed address: http://philosophybakesbread.com/feed/podcast/.
In a day or so, iTunes will have updated and will list the episode here: https://itunes.apple.com/tt/podcast/philosophy-bakes-bread/id976964260
Friday, March 20, 2015
"Philosophy Bakes Bread" podcast launched
For more information about my work, visit EricThomasWeber.org. Also, follow me on Twitter @erictweber.
In March of 2015, I launched a podcast series called Philosophy Bakes Bread, food for thought about life and leadership. The first episode is about "Acceptance and Happiness with Stoicism," and is here. I've also posted the transcript for the episode in a separate post.
For a little more info about the idea behind the podcast, see the introduction page. If you're interested and want to subscribe with a podcast program, the RSS feed address is: http://philosophybakesbread.com/feed/podcast/. I'm still learning about this stuff.
If you're an Apple user, the iTunes page for the podcast is here.
If you've got ideas that you'd like to hear about, email them to me at philosophybakesbread@gmail.com. Also, you can follow the podcast on Twitter @PhilosophyBB.
In March of 2015, I launched a podcast series called Philosophy Bakes Bread, food for thought about life and leadership. The first episode is about "Acceptance and Happiness with Stoicism," and is here. I've also posted the transcript for the episode in a separate post.
For a little more info about the idea behind the podcast, see the introduction page. If you're interested and want to subscribe with a podcast program, the RSS feed address is: http://philosophybakesbread.com/feed/podcast/. I'm still learning about this stuff.
If you're an Apple user, the iTunes page for the podcast is here.
If you've got ideas that you'd like to hear about, email them to me at philosophybakesbread@gmail.com. Also, you can follow the podcast on Twitter @PhilosophyBB.
Monday, February 16, 2015
"Philosophy Bakes Bread," An address in thanks and acceptance of the MS Humanities Council's 2015 Public Humanities Scholar Award
For more info and other writings, visit my Web site: EricThomasWeber.org. Follow me on your preferred medium: Twitter, Facebook, and Google+. I'm also on LinkedIn and Academia.edu.
Finally, if you want to follow my podcasts: Subscribe in a reader
--------------------------
Given the occasion to say thank you to many people, I recorded this address and am using it as my first podcast. I'm learning... What I'm posting here is 1) a link to the podcast page, then 2) an embedded podcast mechanism, in case you'd like to listen to it here on this page. Then, below that I'm including 3) the text of my speech and then 4) the bio that the MHC kindly put together and 5) a picture of my wife, Dr. Annie Davis Weber, and I posing with Governor William Winter and his wife, Elise Varner Winter.
NOTE: This recording was created with my cellphone, which I kept in my suit pocket. There are consequently some noises and somewhat odd sounding moments, muffled a little bit by the way in which I recorded this file. It seemed clear enough to me to be worth sharing nonetheless, but it also is not an example of what my future podcasts will sound like.
Recording / Podcast page:
http://etweber.podomatic.com/entry/2015-02-16T08_48_15-08_00
Or, listen to it here:
As a philosopher, I have often heard that “philosophy bakes no bread.” Perhaps philosophy does not, but some philosophers do. There is a rift in thinking about the humanities, which hinges on the question of whether they do or should metaphorically bake bread. In recent years, the controversial physicist Freeman Dyson asked “When did philosophy lose its bite?” As a scholar, I have from the start sought to advance the connection between humanistic inquiry and contemporary problems. I am not alone in this work, but more importantly I owe immeasurable debts to many people who modeled the work I aspire to do and who have made it possible. So, as I thank the Mississippi Humanities Council and all of you here tonight, I am moved to express my gratitude to many people who have given me guidance, support, and encouragement.
Since our first interactions in 2008, Carol Andersen of the Mississippi Humanities Council has offered me invaluable guidance. I appreciated the opportunity I had recently to meet Executive Director Rockoff, who kindly visited me on a recent trip to Oxford. I thank you both for your support. The Mississippi Humanities Council fills an important role in a state widely known for its rich art and culture. When unique opportunities arise for serious, thoughtful, humanistic engagement, the council gives our local communities the support they need.
I am also grateful to my department chair, Dr. Weixing Chen, who not only took the time to nominate me for this award and to be here tonight, but who also shows his sincere appreciation for the importance of ethics and philosophy for the scholarship and pedagogy of leadership and public policy. My first chair at the university deserves special thanks. Dr. Robert Haws’s vision led to the creation of the interdisciplinary department of Public Policy Leadership in which I write and teach. He strongly encouraged me in the direction of publicly engaged work. While it was my desire and inclination to head in that direction, the pressures of the tenure clock lead many scholars away from less traditional work, such as public writing. So I thank Drs. Chen and Haws as well as the reporters and newspaper editors who welcomed my participation.
David Hampton of the Clarion Ledger took a chance on my writing, and since his retirement, Sam Hall and Jerry Mitchell at the paper have both been supportive. Javad Heiran-Nia, reporter at the Tehran Times, Iran’s major English-language newspaper, has invited me numerous times to write about democracy and liberty where they are sorely needed. And I thank these friends for their encouragement.
More recently, I have had inspiring collaborations with the Executive Director and the Academic Director of the William Winter Institute for Racial Reconciliation, Drs. Susan Glisson and Jennifer Stollman. Dr. Glisson introduced me to Governor Winter. The Governor has been an inspiration for me, as a man respected by everyone with whom his name has ever come up in conversation. He kindly endorsed my 2013 book, titled Democracy and Leadership, and honored me further when he penned an elegant and supportive foreword for my forthcoming 2015 book, titled Uniting Mississippi: Democracy and Leadership in the South.
My deepest thanks go to my family. I married a brilliant woman, who has always strangely enough believed in me and been my strongest supporter. Her parents, Dr. Paul and Jane Davis have shown me love and encouragement, and even came to a symposium I organized with the support of the Council. Here tonight are my parents, Drs. Collin and Dominique Weber, who never flinched for a second when I let them know, “Mom and Dad, I want to major in Philosophy.” My last two notes of thanks go two teachers who have been such mentors to me that I consider them family. Dr. Larry Hickman was the ideal dissertation director at Southern Illinois University and a role model as the engaged and active scholar. Finally, Dr. John Lachs of Vanderbilt University has mentored me since my early undergraduate days, back in the twentieth century. Dr. Lachs showed me what philosophy can do to help each of us pursue happier, more passionate lives. He first taught me that indeed philosophy bakes bread, and he and Dr. Hickman guided me in my studies of philosophy, especially to John Dewey’s work.
Dewey was the greatest public philosopher that the United States has known. His bread baking was prolific, in his voluminous public writings and engagements. His ideas about democracy and education are still vital and needed, and highlight what he called the “supreme intellectual obligation.” At bottom, it involves cultivating in ourselves and in the wider public the scientific attitudes and intellectual habits of mind necessary for appreciating wisdom and for putting it to use. I intend always for my work to pursue this crucial goal, which I believe is one of the most important ways that philosophy, the humanities, and the Mississippi Humanities Council bake the nourishing intellectual bread so vital for living happy and meaningful lives together. I thank you all for the award and for your support for the humanities.
The Humanities Scholar Award recognizes a humanities scholar who has participated in Council programs, serving as an interpreter of his or her discipline for public audiences. Dr. Weber was selected to receive this award in recognition of his outstanding teaching at the University of Mississippi and his work with the Mississippi Humanities Council as a program evaluator, Speakers Bureau presenter and project director on several grants.
Dr. Weber has served as a professor of Public Policy Leadership at the University of Mississippi since 2007. He is also an affiliated faculty member in the Department of Philosophy. He teaches courses in ethics and public policy, critical thinking and communication for public policy, and philosophy of leadership, as well as courses in the Honors College.
Dr. Weber's work with the Mississippi Humanities Council has bridged the complicated academic study of philosophy with engaging, interpretative public programs for general audiences, using philosophical disciplines to understand our unique human experience, and particularly our Mississippi experience, more fully. With grant support from the Council, Weber has brought academics, students and the general public together to contemplate philosophical questions such as ethics at the end of life and civic responsibility as it relates to disabilities.
Visit the Mississippi Humanities Council Web site, as well as EricThomasWeber.org. If you'd like to hear more podcasts by Dr. Weber:
Subscribe in a reader
Finally, if you want to follow my podcasts: Subscribe in a reader
--------------------------
"Philosophy Bakes Bread"
An address in thanks and acceptance of the Mississippi Humanities Council's 2015 Public Humanities Scholar Award, received on Friday, February 13, 2015, in the Old Capitol Building, Jackson, MS.Given the occasion to say thank you to many people, I recorded this address and am using it as my first podcast. I'm learning... What I'm posting here is 1) a link to the podcast page, then 2) an embedded podcast mechanism, in case you'd like to listen to it here on this page. Then, below that I'm including 3) the text of my speech and then 4) the bio that the MHC kindly put together and 5) a picture of my wife, Dr. Annie Davis Weber, and I posing with Governor William Winter and his wife, Elise Varner Winter.
NOTE: This recording was created with my cellphone, which I kept in my suit pocket. There are consequently some noises and somewhat odd sounding moments, muffled a little bit by the way in which I recorded this file. It seemed clear enough to me to be worth sharing nonetheless, but it also is not an example of what my future podcasts will sound like.
Recording / Podcast page:
http://etweber.podomatic.com/entry/2015-02-16T08_48_15-08_00
Or, listen to it here:
Text of the speech:
Philosophy Bakes
Bread
In thanks for the MHC’s Humanities Scholar Award
Dr. Eric Thomas Weber
02/13/15
In the last two years, I have experimented with the hobby of baking bread. The activity is creative, giving a sense of accomplishment, as well as something tasty.
As a philosopher, I have often heard that “philosophy bakes no bread.” Perhaps philosophy does not, but some philosophers do. There is a rift in thinking about the humanities, which hinges on the question of whether they do or should metaphorically bake bread. In recent years, the controversial physicist Freeman Dyson asked “When did philosophy lose its bite?” As a scholar, I have from the start sought to advance the connection between humanistic inquiry and contemporary problems. I am not alone in this work, but more importantly I owe immeasurable debts to many people who modeled the work I aspire to do and who have made it possible. So, as I thank the Mississippi Humanities Council and all of you here tonight, I am moved to express my gratitude to many people who have given me guidance, support, and encouragement.
Since our first interactions in 2008, Carol Andersen of the Mississippi Humanities Council has offered me invaluable guidance. I appreciated the opportunity I had recently to meet Executive Director Rockoff, who kindly visited me on a recent trip to Oxford. I thank you both for your support. The Mississippi Humanities Council fills an important role in a state widely known for its rich art and culture. When unique opportunities arise for serious, thoughtful, humanistic engagement, the council gives our local communities the support they need.
I am also grateful to my department chair, Dr. Weixing Chen, who not only took the time to nominate me for this award and to be here tonight, but who also shows his sincere appreciation for the importance of ethics and philosophy for the scholarship and pedagogy of leadership and public policy. My first chair at the university deserves special thanks. Dr. Robert Haws’s vision led to the creation of the interdisciplinary department of Public Policy Leadership in which I write and teach. He strongly encouraged me in the direction of publicly engaged work. While it was my desire and inclination to head in that direction, the pressures of the tenure clock lead many scholars away from less traditional work, such as public writing. So I thank Drs. Chen and Haws as well as the reporters and newspaper editors who welcomed my participation.
David Hampton of the Clarion Ledger took a chance on my writing, and since his retirement, Sam Hall and Jerry Mitchell at the paper have both been supportive. Javad Heiran-Nia, reporter at the Tehran Times, Iran’s major English-language newspaper, has invited me numerous times to write about democracy and liberty where they are sorely needed. And I thank these friends for their encouragement.
More recently, I have had inspiring collaborations with the Executive Director and the Academic Director of the William Winter Institute for Racial Reconciliation, Drs. Susan Glisson and Jennifer Stollman. Dr. Glisson introduced me to Governor Winter. The Governor has been an inspiration for me, as a man respected by everyone with whom his name has ever come up in conversation. He kindly endorsed my 2013 book, titled Democracy and Leadership, and honored me further when he penned an elegant and supportive foreword for my forthcoming 2015 book, titled Uniting Mississippi: Democracy and Leadership in the South.
My deepest thanks go to my family. I married a brilliant woman, who has always strangely enough believed in me and been my strongest supporter. Her parents, Dr. Paul and Jane Davis have shown me love and encouragement, and even came to a symposium I organized with the support of the Council. Here tonight are my parents, Drs. Collin and Dominique Weber, who never flinched for a second when I let them know, “Mom and Dad, I want to major in Philosophy.” My last two notes of thanks go two teachers who have been such mentors to me that I consider them family. Dr. Larry Hickman was the ideal dissertation director at Southern Illinois University and a role model as the engaged and active scholar. Finally, Dr. John Lachs of Vanderbilt University has mentored me since my early undergraduate days, back in the twentieth century. Dr. Lachs showed me what philosophy can do to help each of us pursue happier, more passionate lives. He first taught me that indeed philosophy bakes bread, and he and Dr. Hickman guided me in my studies of philosophy, especially to John Dewey’s work.
Dewey was the greatest public philosopher that the United States has known. His bread baking was prolific, in his voluminous public writings and engagements. His ideas about democracy and education are still vital and needed, and highlight what he called the “supreme intellectual obligation.” At bottom, it involves cultivating in ourselves and in the wider public the scientific attitudes and intellectual habits of mind necessary for appreciating wisdom and for putting it to use. I intend always for my work to pursue this crucial goal, which I believe is one of the most important ways that philosophy, the humanities, and the Mississippi Humanities Council bake the nourishing intellectual bread so vital for living happy and meaningful lives together. I thank you all for the award and for your support for the humanities.
MHC Bio
2015 Humanities Scholar AwardThe Humanities Scholar Award recognizes a humanities scholar who has participated in Council programs, serving as an interpreter of his or her discipline for public audiences. Dr. Weber was selected to receive this award in recognition of his outstanding teaching at the University of Mississippi and his work with the Mississippi Humanities Council as a program evaluator, Speakers Bureau presenter and project director on several grants.
Dr. Weber has served as a professor of Public Policy Leadership at the University of Mississippi since 2007. He is also an affiliated faculty member in the Department of Philosophy. He teaches courses in ethics and public policy, critical thinking and communication for public policy, and philosophy of leadership, as well as courses in the Honors College.
Dr. Weber's work with the Mississippi Humanities Council has bridged the complicated academic study of philosophy with engaging, interpretative public programs for general audiences, using philosophical disciplines to understand our unique human experience, and particularly our Mississippi experience, more fully. With grant support from the Council, Weber has brought academics, students and the general public together to contemplate philosophical questions such as ethics at the end of life and civic responsibility as it relates to disabilities.
Photo with Governor Winter
From left to right: Elise Varner Winter, Dr. Annie Davis Weber, Governor William Winter, and Dr. Eric Thomas Weber |
Visit the Mississippi Humanities Council Web site, as well as EricThomasWeber.org. If you'd like to hear more podcasts by Dr. Weber:
Subscribe in a reader
Friday, January 30, 2015
SOPHIA Strategic Planning Session, January 2015
For more info and other writings, visit my Web site: EricThomasWeber.org. Follow me on your preferred medium: Twitter, Facebook, and Google+. I'm also on LinkedIn and Academia.edu.
----------
Last night, Thursday, January 29th, 2015, the Board of Trustees and prospective future leaders of the Society of Philosophers in America (SOPHIA) joined together on a phone conference call. In the spring of 2015, Dr. Annie Davis Weber, the University of Mississippi's Manager of Strategic Planning, is teaching a graduate course on strategic planning in the university's School of Education. Her class includes a real strategic planning experience for her students. Fortunately for SOPHIA, I happen to know Dr. (Annie Davis) Weber quite well. SOPHIA is an organization that has been around for many years in a few forms. Over the last six years, I have served as Executive Director, working to get the ball rolling again on a number of activities that embody the values that attracted me to work with SOPHIA. At the same time, given our momentum and our need to take SOPHIA to the next level, we really needed a dedicated effort to plan our future strategically. All of these factors together have made for a pretty extraordinary opportunity.
----------
SOPHIA Strategic Planning Session, January 2015
Last night, Thursday, January 29th, 2015, the Board of Trustees and prospective future leaders of the Society of Philosophers in America (SOPHIA) joined together on a phone conference call. In the spring of 2015, Dr. Annie Davis Weber, the University of Mississippi's Manager of Strategic Planning, is teaching a graduate course on strategic planning in the university's School of Education. Her class includes a real strategic planning experience for her students. Fortunately for SOPHIA, I happen to know Dr. (Annie Davis) Weber quite well. SOPHIA is an organization that has been around for many years in a few forms. Over the last six years, I have served as Executive Director, working to get the ball rolling again on a number of activities that embody the values that attracted me to work with SOPHIA. At the same time, given our momentum and our need to take SOPHIA to the next level, we really needed a dedicated effort to plan our future strategically. All of these factors together have made for a pretty extraordinary opportunity.
The new SOPHIA is in the making. I can feel a great deal of energy coming not only from me or even from just a few of us, but from the group. This is exciting. It is also a really helpful and direct experience of the value and prospects of modern strategic planning. On a personal level, it's pretty wonderful also to see the brilliant woman I married in action - and to appreciate how great she is at what she does.
Stay tuned, because I sincerely believe SOPHIA is poised for some very exciting developments. I've already started getting a number of interested people, groups, and impressively organized and funded programs interested in collaborating with SOPHIA. If you're interested in publicly engaged philosophy, or just in thinking deeply about practical and timely problems, visit our Web site: http://PhilosophersInAmerica.com.
Stay tuned, because I sincerely believe SOPHIA is poised for some very exciting developments. I've already started getting a number of interested people, groups, and impressively organized and funded programs interested in collaborating with SOPHIA. If you're interested in publicly engaged philosophy, or just in thinking deeply about practical and timely problems, visit our Web site: http://PhilosophersInAmerica.com.
In the next two months we'll have a lot to tell you about our ideas. We will also want to hear your ideas and to involve you in the mission of creating a two way street and new public forums for philosophers and people from other fields and beyond the academy to join together in fruitful conversation, following Socrates example, but maybe without the hemlock.
Dr. Eric Thomas Weber
Executive Director
The Society of Philosophers in America
Weber's site:
Monday, December 22, 2014
Op-ed: "Weber: The Promise of Prison Education," Clarion Ledger (Jackson, MS), Dec 20, 2014, 5C
For more info and other writings, visit my Web site: EricThomasWeber.org. Follow me on your preferred medium: Twitter, Facebook, and Google+. I'm also on LinkedIn and Academia.edu.
This piece was in print under the title "Inmates Need to Be Humanized Through Education." A scan in PDF format is here, and a PDF of the original online version is here.
----------
This piece was in print under the title "Inmates Need to Be Humanized Through Education." A scan in PDF format is here, and a PDF of the original online version is here.
----------
Weber: The promise of prison education
In the dozen years that I have been teaching, two moments stand out as the most gripping experiences I have had in my classes. With a group of freshmen sitting by the Honors College fountain at the University of Mississippi, we once talked about philosopher John Lachs's book, In Love with Life.
Lachs explains some ways of thinking that are instrumental for living a happy life. We so often focus on things we cannot change in the past, or we worry intensely about the future, forgetting to live in and enjoy the present, he explains.
Just when we had gone over one of Lachs's beautiful passages covering that insight, thin and golden autumn leaves from a tree overhead began to fall slowly all around us, flipping as they descended, as if they wanted to be noticed. I could not have dreamt of a more beautiful illustration of the joy we can find in appreciating the present.
The next teaching moment that stands out most profoundly for me took place in a very different and unlikely setting. Undergraduates at university are energetic, but often need coaxing. I was startled, therefore, to see just how eager and enthralled a group of students would be when I met them at Parchman Prison.
This past Spring, I had the good fortune to witness Louis Bourgeois's memoire-writing course, the Prison Writes Program, put on at Parchman Prison. I served as the outside evaluator for a grant from the Mississippi Humanities Council, which supported Bourgeois and Vox, an incorporated nonprofit in Oxford, MS.
An author and teacher, Bourgeois opened my eyes to how rewarding prison education can be. Parchman's Education Director Nathan Murphree has been very supportive and welcoming, genuinely happy to have opportunities to offer inmates. In the context of recent stories about Mississippi's prisons, we should remember that there are some very good people serving the public in our Department of Corrections.
The men I witnessed in Bourgeois' Spring class were beyond enthusiastic. They were engaged and passionate about writing, excited that their work was to be published in Vox's volume, In Our Own Words: Writing from Parchman Farm (VoxPress.org).
It was clear to me that students in Bourgeois's class were there because of the meaningful experience of taking his course. In a show of seriousness on the prison's part, though, Murphree offered those who complete Bourgeois' course a letter recommending a 30 day reduction to their sentence.
In a separate effort, Dr. Patrick Alexander and Dr. Otis Pickett started up the Prison-to-College-Pipeline at the University of Mississippi, offering inmates – students – college credit for coursework delivered in the prisons. There is a burgeoning movement for prison education in Mississippi and its prospects are highly promising.
Educating an inmate humanizes a person. Student-inmates intensely feel incarceration. What is needed in our prisons is genuine correction, the real educational effort to treat inmates as human beings capable of redirected behavior and of a meaningful future.
It is commonly thought that what inmates need is job training, vocational education. A 2002 study of prison education and recidivism found, however, that "completion of vocational-technical training while incarcerated was linked to shorter survival times" outside of prison, compared with broader educational programming, like GED and humanistic studies.
These results might seem counterintuitive, but they make sense. Learning how to fix a car is handy, but does not address values and the decisions we make. Of all subjects, I believe that ethics could be among the most enjoyable, transformative, and useful courses we could bring to the prisons. In the big picture, however, it is the humanities which humanize. They explore what it means to be a person, what sort of thing society is, and how we might best think about our participation in it.
When Bourgeois taught in Parchman a second time, he invited me to lead one of his class meetings in October, an experience I had the honor of repeating in December. I jumped at both opportunities.
My background is in Philosophy. I suggested covering the material that has most helped me think through hard times – Epictetus's stoicism. Obsessing about things you cannot change is a sure recipe for misery, he explains, as is blaming others for matters in your control. Epictetus teaches us to focus on what is in our control and to accept what is not. The students at Parchman picked up immediately on the fact that the wisdom we call for in the Serenity prayer is the central stoic insight.
The daunting issue in talking about stoicism was that Epictetus believed that freedom and happiness are always in your control. That message might not go over smoothly in a prison setting. Epictetus teaches that if you accept all that is not in your control, you are free and will be happier, focusing on what is in your control. To my surprise, the students in the class agreed almost unanimously. Since the class did not uniformly agree with Epictetus, we still had the rich interaction that I was hoping for, yet the men were mature, thoughtful, and appreciative of what seemed profound and right in the ancient philosopher's writings.
The inmates I met were engaged. They had not only read the material but had prepared notes about it. Some had printed encyclopedia materials about Epictetus for extra background reading – likely with Murphree's support. As we talked about particular issues, students would note how one point related directly to another that Epictetus had raised elsewhere. We moved to read that other passage. It was a class discussion which equaled my richest and most rewarding taught under the trees in the Grove.
These men were experienced. They took the discussion seriously. They understood how abstract ideas have direct relevance for real life. Unlike bored teenagers, these guys needed no convincing of the value of our discussion.
My experience in December was equally great. These men were fully engaged in a discussion about Jean-Paul Sartre's essay, "Existentialism Is a Humanism," in which the philosopher asserts that people are radically responsible for their choices, and in choosing, proclaim their values. The student-inmates' reactions were sophisticated, interested, and compelling.
It is vital that we not underestimate inmates' potential and intelligence. Plato believed that philosophy should ideally be studied when one has reached 50 years of age. Before that we are inexperienced and preoccupied with life's expediencies.
As an advocate for education, my initial inclination is typically to focus on primary and secondary schooling, as well as on higher education – ideally to keep people out of prison in the first place. That mission can be advanced, however, while still valuing and believing in the potential for prison education.
Inmates want the chance to grow and learn like the rest of us. Working with them is hugely rewarding. If we treat them with respect and if we support meaningful educational opportunities for them, our recidivism rate will decrease and we will save a great deal of money over time. As much as we can, we ought to nurture the germinating prison education initiatives in Mississippi. The movement promises to build citizens' self-respect and sense of their own positive power to pursue meaningful lives upon release.
Eric Thomas Weber is associate professor of Public Policy Leadership at the University of Mississippi and author of Democracy and Leadership (2013) and the forthcoming Uniting Mississippi (2015). He is representing only his own point of view. Follow him on Twitter @erictweber. Contact him at his website, EricThomasWeber.org.
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Latest interview op-ed: "Political Discourse Can Only Be Efficacious If It Is Free: Expert," in Tehran Times, August 25, 2014
For this and other writings, visit my Web site, EricThomasWeber.org. Follow me on your preferred medium: Twitter, Facebook, and Google+. I'm also on LinkedIn and Academia.edu.
----------
Dr. Eric Thomas Weber
You can read the scan of the article by clicking here, or you can read the HTML version following the image.
HTML/text version:
EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW, by Javad Heiran-Nia
TEHRAN - Professor Eric Thomas Weber believes that political discourse can only be efficacious if it is free.
In an interview with the Tehran Times, Weber says, "Political discourse must be supported by honest and sound reasoning."
Weber, the professor of public policy leadership at the University of Mississippi, also says, "Without basis in the truth, in proper logic, and in the use of healthy emotions, the exploitation of sentiments to shape people's attitudes is immoral."
Following is the text of the interview:
Q: How does political discourse shape society?
A: Many factors shape society, including especially the environments we live in and the conditions we endure or enjoy. Many problems arise because the majority of people do not feel the concerns of a minority. In some countries, the majority or its political representatives prohibit the minority even from voicing its concerns in public dialogue. Political discourse is one of the important avenues by which we argue for this or that solution in policy for the resolution of our problems. Such discourse is not always the most powerful force in changing people's minds, as people are often moved by emotions or by self-interest. Therefore, to change minds, we must often find ways to exert pressure on people's emotions or pocket-books.
When a majority or advantaged group routinely does wrong or is insensitive to the plight of others, we can shame offenders by talking about, recording, and broadcasting the troubling behavior we wish to end. We can also tell the stories of those who are affected and oppressed, humanizing them for others and enabling people to see the world from the point of view of that minority. The former force exerts psychological pressure to change for those who feel ashamed when their behavior becomes known and the subject of discussion and disapproval. In areas of great injustice, public discourse in the press, the arts, and the humanities are routinely circumscribed precisely because of their power to shape public opinion for the sake of redressing harms done by the powerful or the majority. As a result, a key measure of a society's freedom is the extent to which such channels and means are free for inquiry, allowing people to speak up against injustice.
Political discourse can draw on the imagery and emotional rhetoric necessary to influence people, but it adds a vital component to the effort to pursue reform for the sake of justice. Political discourse must be supported by honest and sound reasoning. Without basis in the truth, in proper logic, and in the use of healthy emotions, the exploitation of sentiments to shape people's attitudes is immoral. Political discourse is the medium in which ideals and considerations are assessed, clarified, and rendered concrete in reference to contemporary problems. Therefore, any movement towards justice using emotion and rhetoric to shape public opinion must be rooted in the values of free political discourse. Societies which repress political discourse thereby reveal a spreading crack in their governments' claims on legitimate authority.
Q: Does political discourse need a manager for survival?
A: There are several ways to interpret the question of whether political discourse requires a manager. On the one hand, oversight by a government which decides that some ideas or challenges cannot be discussed is evidence that its grasp on authority is achieved only by censorship, by threat of violent, social, or economic pressures to conform. In that sense, a manager for political discourse will appear deeply troubling to anyone who loves freedom and democracy. On the other hand, without some kind of check on public voices, people could injure one another with baseless libel, rooted in falsehood and intended to harm. Credibility matters. The truth matters. Therefore, the real managers of discourse in the context of libel are mechanisms like the courts, through which individuals can protect their reputations with lawsuits. In addition, in the courts, laws against perjury contribute to managing truth-telling, but only in limited contexts.
Two more points are deeply important for considering what kind of management is acceptable and even morally necessary for political discourse to avoid harm or to enable social progress. The first is that people lead busy lives and often lack the time to dedicate themselves to the research and writing it takes to weigh in provocatively on political issues. Given this constraint, "opinion leaders" play an important role in advancing political discourse. The trouble is that powerful and advantaged citizens and organizations have enormously greater resources for the sponsorship of voices representing their interests, while the disadvantaged citizens lack such resources and consequently voice for their concerns. Some people can help diminish the imbalance to a small degree, including the nobler religious leaders who speak up for the least among us. Others are journalists who are sometimes supported by their readership and editors for speaking up for the greater public interest. Then there are the more occasional contributors from universities around the world, like mine, and from other industries.
The second though more important source of management of political discourse is an educated public. The public exerts its force on political discourse first and most fundamentally in its reactions to the news of government action. The public's critiques must be informed and enabled, however, which occurs through the empowering results of universal education. Thomas Jefferson famously advocated for an educated public as the only guarantee for the preservation of a free society. Without an educated populace, the arguments of those in power do not have to be well reasoned and demonstrated. Frederick Douglass explained long ago that power concedes nothing without demand. The public must both understand and react intelligently to the ideas put forth in political discourse. Then it must demand that persons in positions of power enact those policies and decisions which reflect the will of the people. In this sense, then, the greatest manager of political discourse, as inchoate as it often appears to be, is the people exerting pressure on public figures and raising expectations for leadership.
Q: How can political discourse prevail in a society like societies in the Middle East?
A: Political discourse can only be efficacious if it is free. Before any other demand brought to politicians, a free press must be the first step. No figure should be above scrutiny. When people go hungry, when medicines are needed but denied, when persons are imprisoned wrongfully, the people have no recourse, no avenue for redress if they are not permitted to raise concerns about justice, truth, and reform. In the United States, the protection of free speech is so great that radically unpopular messages are tolerated. The reason is not that people enjoy such speech. Rather, it is important to know what citizens think, even if they are wrong. More importantly, if people do not have the release of energies and pressures which comes from speaking one's mind about what one believes to be right, the only alternative is explosive violence. Therefore, the protection of radical and unpopular speech is crucial for social stability, even though one might expect the reverse to be the case.
In recent years, the world has witnessed uprisings in such developments as the Arab Spring. These moments are examples of the buildup of dissatisfactions not permitted release. In time, more constriction of the people will almost certainly result in further eruptions of revolutionary action. Societies unwilling to expand people's freedoms will be the least able to maintain themselves. Ironically, the desire for stability should prompt leaders to fight for opening up the avenues for political discourse which will appear turbulent and chaotic. Battles in the realm of ideas, however, are processes by which intelligence is refined and the best ideas can rise to the surface like cream. Conflicts about how best to lead society replace political imprisonment, violence, and censorship, and in exchange offer the give and take of public inquiry in pursuit of the wisest course of action for leadership. After all, there is no better test of the merits and flaws of one's policy proposals than the deep scrutiny which arises when one submits his or her ideas for objective evaluation, for the receipt of the objections from opposition and skeptics.
There is no more important development which could yield moral, social, and intellectual progress in the Middle East than the progressive growth of freedom in public dialogue. All else hinges upon this, including the legitimacy of existing political authorities, and consequently the likelihood of their long-term survival. It may seem counterintuitive, but the clearest path to a stable society in much of the Middle East runs through change – through the sincere release of the reins which presently inhibit the exercise of free political discourse.
Dr. Eric Thomas Weber is associate professor of Public Policy Leadership at the University of Mississippi and is author of four books, including Democracy and Leadership: On Pragmatism and Virtue (November, 2013) - 30% discount available when you buy from the publisher's Web site, see discount flyer.
------------------
----------
"Political Discourse Can Only Be Efficacious If It Is Free: Expert"
Printed in The Tehran Times, August 25, 2014, International sectionDr. Eric Thomas Weber
You can read the scan of the article by clicking here, or you can read the HTML version following the image.
Click here to open a PDF scan of the article. |
EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW, by Javad Heiran-Nia
TEHRAN - Professor Eric Thomas Weber believes that political discourse can only be efficacious if it is free.
In an interview with the Tehran Times, Weber says, "Political discourse must be supported by honest and sound reasoning."
Weber, the professor of public policy leadership at the University of Mississippi, also says, "Without basis in the truth, in proper logic, and in the use of healthy emotions, the exploitation of sentiments to shape people's attitudes is immoral."
Following is the text of the interview:
Q: How does political discourse shape society?
A: Many factors shape society, including especially the environments we live in and the conditions we endure or enjoy. Many problems arise because the majority of people do not feel the concerns of a minority. In some countries, the majority or its political representatives prohibit the minority even from voicing its concerns in public dialogue. Political discourse is one of the important avenues by which we argue for this or that solution in policy for the resolution of our problems. Such discourse is not always the most powerful force in changing people's minds, as people are often moved by emotions or by self-interest. Therefore, to change minds, we must often find ways to exert pressure on people's emotions or pocket-books.
When a majority or advantaged group routinely does wrong or is insensitive to the plight of others, we can shame offenders by talking about, recording, and broadcasting the troubling behavior we wish to end. We can also tell the stories of those who are affected and oppressed, humanizing them for others and enabling people to see the world from the point of view of that minority. The former force exerts psychological pressure to change for those who feel ashamed when their behavior becomes known and the subject of discussion and disapproval. In areas of great injustice, public discourse in the press, the arts, and the humanities are routinely circumscribed precisely because of their power to shape public opinion for the sake of redressing harms done by the powerful or the majority. As a result, a key measure of a society's freedom is the extent to which such channels and means are free for inquiry, allowing people to speak up against injustice.
Political discourse can draw on the imagery and emotional rhetoric necessary to influence people, but it adds a vital component to the effort to pursue reform for the sake of justice. Political discourse must be supported by honest and sound reasoning. Without basis in the truth, in proper logic, and in the use of healthy emotions, the exploitation of sentiments to shape people's attitudes is immoral. Political discourse is the medium in which ideals and considerations are assessed, clarified, and rendered concrete in reference to contemporary problems. Therefore, any movement towards justice using emotion and rhetoric to shape public opinion must be rooted in the values of free political discourse. Societies which repress political discourse thereby reveal a spreading crack in their governments' claims on legitimate authority.
Q: Does political discourse need a manager for survival?
A: There are several ways to interpret the question of whether political discourse requires a manager. On the one hand, oversight by a government which decides that some ideas or challenges cannot be discussed is evidence that its grasp on authority is achieved only by censorship, by threat of violent, social, or economic pressures to conform. In that sense, a manager for political discourse will appear deeply troubling to anyone who loves freedom and democracy. On the other hand, without some kind of check on public voices, people could injure one another with baseless libel, rooted in falsehood and intended to harm. Credibility matters. The truth matters. Therefore, the real managers of discourse in the context of libel are mechanisms like the courts, through which individuals can protect their reputations with lawsuits. In addition, in the courts, laws against perjury contribute to managing truth-telling, but only in limited contexts.
Two more points are deeply important for considering what kind of management is acceptable and even morally necessary for political discourse to avoid harm or to enable social progress. The first is that people lead busy lives and often lack the time to dedicate themselves to the research and writing it takes to weigh in provocatively on political issues. Given this constraint, "opinion leaders" play an important role in advancing political discourse. The trouble is that powerful and advantaged citizens and organizations have enormously greater resources for the sponsorship of voices representing their interests, while the disadvantaged citizens lack such resources and consequently voice for their concerns. Some people can help diminish the imbalance to a small degree, including the nobler religious leaders who speak up for the least among us. Others are journalists who are sometimes supported by their readership and editors for speaking up for the greater public interest. Then there are the more occasional contributors from universities around the world, like mine, and from other industries.
The second though more important source of management of political discourse is an educated public. The public exerts its force on political discourse first and most fundamentally in its reactions to the news of government action. The public's critiques must be informed and enabled, however, which occurs through the empowering results of universal education. Thomas Jefferson famously advocated for an educated public as the only guarantee for the preservation of a free society. Without an educated populace, the arguments of those in power do not have to be well reasoned and demonstrated. Frederick Douglass explained long ago that power concedes nothing without demand. The public must both understand and react intelligently to the ideas put forth in political discourse. Then it must demand that persons in positions of power enact those policies and decisions which reflect the will of the people. In this sense, then, the greatest manager of political discourse, as inchoate as it often appears to be, is the people exerting pressure on public figures and raising expectations for leadership.
Q: How can political discourse prevail in a society like societies in the Middle East?
A: Political discourse can only be efficacious if it is free. Before any other demand brought to politicians, a free press must be the first step. No figure should be above scrutiny. When people go hungry, when medicines are needed but denied, when persons are imprisoned wrongfully, the people have no recourse, no avenue for redress if they are not permitted to raise concerns about justice, truth, and reform. In the United States, the protection of free speech is so great that radically unpopular messages are tolerated. The reason is not that people enjoy such speech. Rather, it is important to know what citizens think, even if they are wrong. More importantly, if people do not have the release of energies and pressures which comes from speaking one's mind about what one believes to be right, the only alternative is explosive violence. Therefore, the protection of radical and unpopular speech is crucial for social stability, even though one might expect the reverse to be the case.
In recent years, the world has witnessed uprisings in such developments as the Arab Spring. These moments are examples of the buildup of dissatisfactions not permitted release. In time, more constriction of the people will almost certainly result in further eruptions of revolutionary action. Societies unwilling to expand people's freedoms will be the least able to maintain themselves. Ironically, the desire for stability should prompt leaders to fight for opening up the avenues for political discourse which will appear turbulent and chaotic. Battles in the realm of ideas, however, are processes by which intelligence is refined and the best ideas can rise to the surface like cream. Conflicts about how best to lead society replace political imprisonment, violence, and censorship, and in exchange offer the give and take of public inquiry in pursuit of the wisest course of action for leadership. After all, there is no better test of the merits and flaws of one's policy proposals than the deep scrutiny which arises when one submits his or her ideas for objective evaluation, for the receipt of the objections from opposition and skeptics.
There is no more important development which could yield moral, social, and intellectual progress in the Middle East than the progressive growth of freedom in public dialogue. All else hinges upon this, including the legitimacy of existing political authorities, and consequently the likelihood of their long-term survival. It may seem counterintuitive, but the clearest path to a stable society in much of the Middle East runs through change – through the sincere release of the reins which presently inhibit the exercise of free political discourse.
Dr. Eric Thomas Weber is associate professor of Public Policy Leadership at the University of Mississippi and is author of four books, including Democracy and Leadership: On Pragmatism and Virtue (November, 2013) - 30% discount available when you buy from the publisher's Web site, see discount flyer.
------------------
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)